Rambo

[mrBadwrench]

Anyone seen it yet?

Im going to the 3:30 tommorow.

[Kyle]

Waiting for a TS.
Not sure it's worth spending money on.
Stallone is getting old.

[LOhateVE]

Might go tomorrow if friend can go, or sunday if she can't go tomorrow.

[Creep_MA]

Might be going next wens with a couple of friends, original was good, so remark better be just as good

[LOhateVE]

remark?

this is Rambo 4

1-3 were all great

[Kyle]

Yeah, this isn't a remake.
It may be just called "RAMBO", but it's the fourth, and a sequel to 3.

[mrBadwrench]

It was originially going to be called John Rambo, which I think woulda been better than just Rambo, I got pushed back to the 5:30 today..

[mrBadwrench]

Sorry bout repost...

Rambo was AMAZING.. definately have to see it in theatres because there are TONS of explosions and stuff... Its like 9999.9 percent more gory than all the saws put together so if you dont like gore definately do not try and watch it..

[sum182oftheyear]

What about the story? Other than the explosions, was the story/acting good?

[mrBadwrench]

I was actually surprised, I thought the story would be a dud like rocky sort of was, but it was actually quite impressive.. I didnt think too much of the other soldiers' acting but stallone impressed me, especially with his old age. Also the story got right to the point, and stayed there. I cant stand it when they have an hour setting up the story and only 30 minutes carrying it out, it only takes about 15-25 minutes to get to the main action and stays there until the end of the movie.

I would say its not as good as the first rambo, but better than the last 2.